Leverage the Power of Your Interactive Whiteboard


Written on April 20, 2010 – 9:42 PM | by millerb
Dr. Puentedura's Model

Dr. Puentedura's Model

In the previous post, we looked a model created by Dr. Ruben R. Puentedura that encourages us to use our technology at a higher level – moving from a mode of substitution to a mode of augmentation, modification, or maybe even redefinition.  Just to review, substitution means you are using the technology as a direct substitute – with no functional improvement.  Augmentation means you are using the technology as a direct substitute, but with a functional improvement.  Modification means your use of technology allows for significant task redesign.  Finally, redefinition means your use of technology allows for the creation of new tasks that were previously inconceivable.

Let’s apply this model to those expensive tools that are popping up in numerous classrooms across our district:  Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs). Fortunately, this model is general enough that it will apply to you – whether you’re using a Smartboard, Interwrite, or Mimio.  Enough build-up – let’s get started.

We’ll take a look examples of usage under each level.  As you read, be honest with yourself and see where you fall.

Level 1 – Substitution: Granted, the IWB does come with several cool colors of “digital” ink, but using the board only as a writing surface (with all those cool colors) certainly qualifies as a direct substitution of a chalkboard or a whiteboard.  Don’t fret if this is where you are – it’s perfectly okay!  We all have to start somewhere.  Honestly, I would imagine very few IWB users have started any higher.  The key is to know you’re at this level, see the importance of making a transition, and be willing to go for it.

Level 2 – Augmentation: There are many examples at this level, but let’s focus on a couple.  The first that comes to mind would be the ability to create a new page once you have filled the existing page.  What do you do when you need more space on your chalkboard?  Erase something else, right?  On an IWB, just add a blank page and get back to work – no erasing needed.  The advantages our numerous:  adding a page is faster than erasing the board; you can pull up previous pages and review that work with students; save this work from year to year for a refresher before teaching the lesson; print these pages and send them home to absent students.  One of those examples touched on the idea of saving.  At the end of the class, save your work.  Pull it up tomorrow with those same students and you have a quick review – no need to rewrite anything.  Do you teach the same lesson to three different classes?  Ever forget where each class was in the lesson?  Keep a different “notebook” (or file) for each class and that problem is solved.

Level 3 – Modification: Again, there are many examples at this level, but we’ll focus our attention on only a couple.  Level 2 talked about printing pages and sending them home.  This is the digital age – you could email them… or even put them on your Moodle site (see previous post on Moodle).  In a matter of a few minutes a day (for real!), you could post daily notes to your Moodle, giving your students one more resource.  I know – not everyone can afford the Internet right now in this economy.  Even if one of your students use this as a resource though – isn’t that still important?  Also, I know we already have been cognizant of printing, but it never hurts to re-concentrate our efforts of being greener.  [stepping down from my soapbox]  What about using the gallery of images and interactive tools that come with your software?  There are resources hiding in that gallery that can transform many lessons.  Not sure how to find the gallery?  Let us know!

Level 4 – Redefinition: I’m no expert with this model, but I have to believe the following example would land in the redefinition level.  Each brand of IWB comes with a screen recording tool.  Once you hit the record button, the recorder simply records everything you do on your computer screen.  For example:  let’s say you’re trying to teach 3rd graders to write cursive.  Fire up your IWB, hit the record button, and model this for your students.  When you’re finished, hit stop.  After stopping the recording, you’ll be asked about saving the recording to your computer.  Here’s where the magic begins:  open that recorded video, set your player to loop, and play it back full screen.  Now your students can watch your demonstration repeatedly when they get stuck as you walk around assisting your students individually.  This is incredibly powerful. What about doing this when teaching long division?  Or how to work through an equation in algebra or beyond?  (By the way – you don’t need an IWB for this.  It will work just as well if you have a wireless slate.) To me, this is a redefinition of how you can teach.  Teaching would be so much easier if we could bring in more adults for one-on-one assistance.  This isn’t going to happen anytime soon (if ever) – so in the meantime, this will let you be in two places at one time.  I see this as being one of the most important skills to learn and to incorporate into your daily practice.  Finally, what do you do with that file when you’re done playing it in your classroom?  Put it on your Moodle site and make it available to your students 24/7.  This would be huge for parents when they’re trying to help their student with an involved math problem.

Do these examples sound like a lot of work? Well, it will take extra work on your part versus just writing on a chalkboard – or worse yet – continually treating your IWB as a chalkboard.  Hopefully you can tell from the length of this post my position on whether or not it’s worth it.

When you’re ready to try any of these suggestions and feel like you might need some help, please let us know!

Tags: , , , , , ,

Technology Adoption Lifecycle


Written on April 16, 2010 – 10:48 AM | by millerb

The post for today will be less informative and more of a foundation builder for future posts.  If you’re game, I want to ask you to become a little reflective and think about how you are using technology in your classroom – whether it’s a simple MP3 player, a desktop computer, an interactive whiteboard, or any other form of technology.  As you read this post, think about those tools and where they fall on the continuum of this diagram.

Credit:  Dr. Ruben R. Puentedura

Click the image for the fullsize view. Credit: Dr. Ruben R. Puentedura

I was first introduced to the diagram above about six months ago by a former tech director that had supported over 78,000 students.  When she shared that number, it quickly caught (and kept) my attention.  During her presentation, she referred to Dr. Puentedura’s research and his philosophy of technology in education.  Let’s examine the diagram and see how this thing works…

There are a couple of things to make note of:  1.)  the green arrow along the left edge of the diagram and 2.) the dark gray horizontal line between augmentation and modification.  In his research, he states the bottom left cell, substitution, is not where we want to be.  Our goal is to move upward in that column – from augmentation to modification and for the most impact, redefinition.  He states that it’s okay to be in the bottom two cells – as long as we’re transitioning.  If we stay there for more than [three or four] months, or if we stay there “because I’ve taught it this way for 10 years, why should I change what I’m doing just because I have new technology?”, then that can be problematic (but that’s a whole other blog post).

So let’s take a look at this diagram and apply some technology that is meaningful.  If you look at the third column, Dr. Puentedura examines the word processor.  At the substitution level, you would literally replace the typewriter with the word processor and use no other features – such as the spell checker, cut and paste, etc.  In a podcast of his, he uses the example of spotting a mistake you made in your word processing.  Do you hit the “backspace” key over and over to back up to that mistake, or do you use the mouse to go directly to that mistake, or better yet, do you use the spellchecker and have it do the work for you?  His research has found if you stay at this substitution level, your productivity will actually drop.  (Think about having to save the file, print the file, go get the page from the printer – and in our buildings – that can be a long walk!)  It would be faster to type the document and pull the paper directly from the typewriter.

What does this look like in the augmentation stage?  According to the diagram, it would be using some of the basic tools of the word processor.  The spellchecker, cut and paste, word count, formatting, etc. would be good examples.  At this stage, you are using the word processor and benefiting from its power, but there’s still room for improvement – there’s still room to make more gains.  His research has found that, at this stage, [student impact] remains the same or makes a slight increase.

The first two stages have only enhanced your workflow or the educational process, but he’s not satisfied with that.  His idea is that technology should transform the way we do things.

The third stage, modification, is where transformation begins.  He’s suggesting we integrate email (isn’t that word processing in a different form?), spreadsheets, and more into our word processing – something that would be very difficult to do with a typewriter.  Instead of authoring a document, printing it, then sharing it, the modification stage allows for authoring, then emailing the document – thus saving time and resources.  We can also incorporate charts into our documents by using a spreadsheet.  His research has found there to be a substantial increase in [student impact] at this stage.

The final stage is redefinition.  At this point, looking at the word processing example, we can bring groups of people together to collaborate on a document (think typewith.me) and get their viewpoints in real-time.  Thanks to today’s technology this is extremely easy to do, whether it’s a document or spreadsheet, a web page or a drawing.  For what it’s worth, his research has found [amazing growth] on [student impact] as compared to those districts that don’t make these progressions.

So is all this important?  I believe it is, but who cares what I think – I don’t have direct contact with the students.  Teachers, it’s your opinion that matters.  Where does your use (or your students’ use) of technology fall on this chart?  Are you simply substituting, or are you leveraging the tool to make a strong impact?

I know this has been a lengthy post, but it lays the groundwork now for future posts where we’ll take a look at specific tools and ways to climb this technology adoption ladder.

Tags: , , , ,

Tools for Adults to Help Kids Connect Safely


Written on April 12, 2010 – 1:39 PM | by kaehrj

NetSavvyAre your Students more tech-savvy than you are?  Are they constantly using words and phrases that make you feel like they are speaking another language? 

Challenges like these face educators every day, and that is why the Sprint 4NetSafety Project partnered with the National Education Association’s Health Information Network (NEA HIN) to create bNetS@vvy!  Their mission is to empower educators, parents/guardians and other adults with the knowledge they need to help kids connect safely online. 

Children of all ages, but especially tweens, can be at risk when online.  The internet doesn’t have to be a scary place for them or you!  This is a tool that you can use together.  Common topics you will see covered are cyberbullying, texting, and social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter.  Much of the content comes from fellow educators, experts, and even students.

For additional Internet safety information and videos, visit the Sprint 4NetSafety website.

Tags: , , ,